Goliath Posted September 10, 2006 Share Posted September 10, 2006 Who gets the better end? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gateb Posted September 10, 2006 Share Posted September 10, 2006 Depends who the guy who lost Johnson's RBs are now. Harrison and Williams are going to have great seasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goliath Posted September 10, 2006 Author Share Posted September 10, 2006 Depends who the guy who lost Johnson's RBs are now. Harrison and Williams are going to have great seasons. RBs: Warrick Dunn, Deuce McAllister and Michael Bennett Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goliath Posted September 10, 2006 Author Share Posted September 10, 2006 And you use two RBs so no doubt Gore and Dunn will be the starters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gateb Posted September 10, 2006 Share Posted September 10, 2006 That has potential to be a great trade for the guy getting the two WRs. If Gore has a breakout year and Dunn gets more production with TJ Duckett gone, he will have an insane team. That's a big if though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
so-cal dub Posted September 10, 2006 Share Posted September 10, 2006 Hell no! Johnson and Jones...no way Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goliath Posted September 10, 2006 Author Share Posted September 10, 2006 Gateb-Harrison package is better So Cal- Johnson's package is better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herc Posted September 10, 2006 Share Posted September 10, 2006 i think LJ is overrated, but still, you won't win with dunn and gore as your starting RBs. in FF you have to decide whether your team is better or worse after the trade, not necessarily whether the trade itself is fair or not Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
so-cal dub Posted September 10, 2006 Share Posted September 10, 2006 Gateb-Harrison package is better So Cal- Johnson's package is better I mean, I wouldn't get rid of those two in one package. Jones has potential to be a #2 reciever in FF. Thats 2 good players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herc Posted September 10, 2006 Share Posted September 10, 2006 gore has value because he's a featured back ina league with many teams who have either unsettled rb situations or rb by committee strategies. that doesn't mean that he's going to have a great year in that league. he's still on a team without a great o-line and with an unproven qb. defenses will be keying on gore Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Jeans Posted September 10, 2006 Share Posted September 10, 2006 Why do you want us to rate every trade that gets proposed to you in fantasy football. No one cares about your league. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
so-cal dub Posted September 10, 2006 Share Posted September 10, 2006 Why do you want us to rate every trade that gets proposed to you in fantasy football. No one cares about your league. It's called info, and I find it interesting. Gets me in tune. So, your theory of nobody caring is false. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now