BlueInCanada Posted September 4, 2016 Share Posted September 4, 2016 OFFENSE: QB (2): Eli Manning, Ryan NassibRB (5): Rashad Jennings, Shane Vereen, Orleans Darkwa, Paul Perkins, Bobby RaineyWR (6): Odell Beckham Jr., Sterling Shepard, Victor Cruz, Dwayne Harris, Roger Lewis, Tavarres KingTE (3): Will Tye, Larry Donnell, Jerell AdamsOL (8): Marshall Newhouse, John Jerry, Weston Richburg, Justin Pugh, Ereck Flowers, Will Beatty, Bobby Hart, Brett Jones DEFENSE: DT (4): Johnathan Hankins, Damon Harrison, Jay Bromley, Montori HughesDE (5): Jason Pierre-Paul, Olivier Vernon, Owa Odighizuwa, Kerry Wynn, Romeo OkwaraLB (8): Devon Kennard, Jasper Brinkley, Jonathan Casillas, Mark Herzlich, B.J. Goodson, Keenan Robinson, J.T. Thomas, Kelvin SheppardCB (5): Eli Apple, Janoris Jenkins, Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie, Trevin Wade, Leon HallS (4): Landon Collins, Darian Thompson, Nat Berhe, Mykkele Thompson SPECIALISTS: K: Randy Bullock (Josh Brown suspended)P: Brad WingLS: Zak DeOssie Although I see the Giants trying to pick up a player from the waiver wires, here's the team heading into 2016. Surprised that there are 8 LBs and 5 RBs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth Posted September 4, 2016 Share Posted September 4, 2016 How does Herzlich make the team every year? We really can't find a fucking special teams lineman that doesn't totally suck at his regular position? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lughead Posted September 4, 2016 Share Posted September 4, 2016 So Basically its the Final 53 that is not the Final 53, just the Final 53 as of Saturday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herc Posted September 4, 2016 Share Posted September 4, 2016 I won't miss Andre Williams Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueInCanada Posted September 4, 2016 Author Share Posted September 4, 2016 So Basically its the Final 53 that is not the Final 53, just the Final 53 as of Saturday. It's the 53 to avoid any penalty from the NFL. I'm sure a player or two will be different come the game vs Dallas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Storm Posted September 4, 2016 Share Posted September 4, 2016 I won't miss Andre Williams He is awful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tempest Posted September 4, 2016 Share Posted September 4, 2016 I'll miss Andre Williams. I know he wasn't great and he could have done better with the limited work he was given after his first year. Really thought he could have become the bellcow RB we still haven't found. I'm positive he'll be on another roster this year, I just don't want to read "why didn't he run like that here". Did like what I saw in Rainey this preseason so yeah I'd keep Rainey over Williams and see no future in Orleans Darkwa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UK-Giantsfan Posted September 4, 2016 Share Posted September 4, 2016 Jordan Raanan @JordanRaanan 16s17 seconds agoThe Giants claimed DT Robert Thomas off waivers, per source. who the fuck is he ? ....and we dont need a DT ( and Chargers just claimed Andre Williams ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UK-Giantsfan Posted September 4, 2016 Share Posted September 4, 2016 Retweet More Ralph Vacchiano @RVacchianoSNY 5m5 minutes ago WR Geremy Davis, the former sixth-round pick cut by Giants yesterday, is signing with their practice squad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigblue25 Posted September 4, 2016 Share Posted September 4, 2016 Released Hughes to sign Thomas, which makes no sense to me. Cauran Reid was out there at DT too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth Posted September 4, 2016 Share Posted September 4, 2016 Williams claimed by San Diego off waivers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Storm Posted September 5, 2016 Share Posted September 5, 2016 Released Brinkley already to sign "Josh Johnson" QB. Not really sure why they'd release a contributing MLB for a guy who will be released as soon as someone gets injured for a length of time and we need to replace the depth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. P Posted September 5, 2016 Share Posted September 5, 2016 Released Brinkley already to sign "Josh Johnson" QB. Not really sure why they'd release a contributing MLB for a guy who will be released as soon as someone gets injured for a length of time and we need to replace the depth. Interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tempest Posted September 5, 2016 Share Posted September 5, 2016 Released Brinkley already to sign "Josh Johnson" QB. Not really sure why they'd release a contributing MLB for a guy who will be released as soon as someone gets injured for a length of time and we need to replace the depth. They didn't plan on keeping all those LBs but for a QB? Seems wasteful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueInCanada Posted September 5, 2016 Author Share Posted September 5, 2016 They didn't plan on keeping all those LBs but for a QB? Seems wasteful. I'm surprised there are 5 RBs on the team. I thought for sure a RB/LB would of been cut to make room for OL/TE help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herc Posted September 5, 2016 Share Posted September 5, 2016 Weird. Been a while since we had three qbs if I remember correctly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueInCanada Posted September 5, 2016 Author Share Posted September 5, 2016 Weird. Been a while since we had three qbs if I remember correctly Not since the Hefty Lefty days, I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigblue25 Posted September 8, 2016 Share Posted September 8, 2016 Is Johnson just a Dak decoy for this week? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmenroc Posted September 8, 2016 Share Posted September 8, 2016 Could be, but that's a risky move sending a borderline starting LB through waivers.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigblue25 Posted September 8, 2016 Share Posted September 8, 2016 They really don't emphasize LB's anyway. Surprised they still have seven Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tempest Posted September 9, 2016 Share Posted September 9, 2016 They really don't emphasize LB's anyway. Surprised they still have seven Easier to release and bring back in a pinch. Too many linebackers, less emphasis in the defense and only slightly more valuable on special teams. On another note, Dallas Cowboys kept more RB's just for special teams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now