Lughead Posted January 24, 2013 Share Posted January 24, 2013 So Justin Tuck in NOW watching tape NOW,..... NOW watching tape to see what was going wrong with him ...NOW..... The defensive end has been studying game tapes from this season, trying to figure out what No. 91 was doing, because he just doesn’t recognize himself. Tuck knows his contribution was paltry compared to past seasons Shouldn't this be done after Each Game? Tuck On Tape Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. P Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 does it say he wasn't also doing it over the course of the season? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeMesiS Posted January 25, 2013 Share Posted January 25, 2013 Hey Justin, haven't play to my standards for nearly 3 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lughead Posted January 29, 2013 Author Share Posted January 29, 2013 does it say he wasn't also doing it over the course of the season? If he was doing it over the course of the season Wouldn't he then make adjustments during the season? Now he is looking at them saying Why did I do this , Why did I do that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmenroc Posted January 29, 2013 Share Posted January 29, 2013 I'm sure there was game tape shown to them over the course of the season...but it does raise a red flag that he's being this critical of his play now. I mean, I'm sure he was critical of his own play during the season, but why they wouldn't evaluate it to the level where they'd find a different plan, a different move...speaks of not being fully prepared week to week. I think our team as a whole went into this season unprepared on a gross level. We were coasting off the SB win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gman329 Posted January 29, 2013 Share Posted January 29, 2013 I'm sure there was game tape shown to them over the course of the season...but it does raise a red flag that he's being this critical of his play now. I mean, I'm sure he was critical of his own play during the season, but why they wouldn't evaluate it to the level where they'd find a different plan, a different move...speaks of not being fully prepared week to week. I think our team as a whole went into this season unprepared on a gross level. We were coasting off the SB win. Sure didn't look that way against SF, NO or GB though, did it? For a variety of reasons - injuries, got out schemed, etc - we didn't play well when it counted (Atl & Balt).....but I don't believe anybody "coasted". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmenroc Posted January 29, 2013 Share Posted January 29, 2013 Sure didn't look that way against SF, NO or GB though, did it? For a variety of reasons - injuries, got out schemed, etc - we didn't play well when it counted (Atl & Balt).....but I don't believe anybody "coasted". Perhaps we were still coasting, but our coaches out schemed SF, NO, GB? No, we didn't play well when it counted. But yeah, I think we coasted for a while that led us to play down to lesser competition...resulting in a few hard losses that had they been wins...Atlanta and Baltimore may not have been as crucial to our postseason birth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nas Posted January 29, 2013 Share Posted January 29, 2013 It pains me to say it.. but I don't think Tuck is as good as we, or some of us, think he is. Period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gman329 Posted January 29, 2013 Share Posted January 29, 2013 It pains me to say it.. but I don't think Tuck is as good as we, or some of us, think he is. Period. As I've pointed out in the past, Tuck's best play has been as a DT, including the 2007 per Bowl run. He was used inside, esp on passing downs and his quickness on stunts and loops gave OL's fits. He's never really been the DE we expected after Michael retired. Maybe he's best suited to being a situational player, albeit an expensive one! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nas Posted January 29, 2013 Share Posted January 29, 2013 As I've pointed out in the past, Tuck's best play has been as a DT, including the 2007 per Bowl run. He was used inside, esp on passing downs and his quickness on stunts and loops gave OL's fits. He's never really been the DE we expected after Michael retired. Maybe he's best suited to being a situational player, albeit an expensive one! Yep, as a DE he's not good.. and given how we can use some help at DT, it wouldn't surpise me if the Giants go DE in the first round if there's a stud DE available... Osi sucks major balls and will bite the dust. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmenroc Posted January 29, 2013 Share Posted January 29, 2013 As I've pointed out in the past, Tuck's best play has been as a DT, including the 2007 per Bowl run. He was used inside, esp on passing downs and his quickness on stunts and loops gave OL's fits. He's never really been the DE we expected after Michael retired. Maybe he's best suited to being a situational player, albeit an expensive one! I think Tuck is a good pass rusher and I think he's okay against the run so long as he's on his way to the QB. The biggest issue I've seen with Tuck is his ability to either shed a block or to hold the point. If he's running a stunt, O lineman don't have a chance to get their hands on him. If he's just going straight at a guy, it's a huge detriment to his game. I said it before that I think our D line suffered greatly this season, not just due to injury or individual play, but a lack of stunts/twists/etc. Too often we went straight at the offense expecting the guys to get home. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herc Posted January 29, 2013 Share Posted January 29, 2013 just looked up his career stats and i can't believe he only has 50 sacks in 6 years Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandolphScott Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 just looked up his career stats and i can't believe he only has 50 sacks in 6 years He wasn't a full time starter until 2008. 2007 was his break out year with 10 sacks and he suffered from season ending injuries in 2005 and 2006. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigblue25 Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 He's had nine sacks in the past two years, with 57 tackles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sephiroth Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 He's had nine sacks in the past two years, with 57 tackles. It's strange to say, but it's almost like he's never done anything without Spagnuolo's scheme. The second Fewell got here Tuck became invisible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UK-Giantsfan Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 Tuck looks finished to me ........i hope we start JPP and Kiwi at Ends next season Osi can fuck off too unless he wants to play as a 'ball stripping' backup for loads less cash ! Hope we draft another DE in the 2nd Regards UK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorBanksCarsonVanPelt Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 It's strange to say, but it's almost like he's never done anything without Spagnuolo's scheme. The second Fewell got here Tuck became invisible. This and the after effects of that cheap shot from that Flozell Faggot... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now