gateb Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 I'll take him at 44. And we still have 56. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shockjock Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 I'll take him at 44. And we still have 56. we traded up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mastershake Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 what was the trade? what picks !!!!!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uconngiants Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 Just traded up to 43 and got him thoughts??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uconngiants Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 what was the trade? what picks !!!!!!!!!!!!!! ????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gateb Posted April 29, 2006 Author Share Posted April 29, 2006 Okay, not 56. And I don't know what the trade details were. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Carbo Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 Please! Will someone just put me out of my misery now! Sinorice Moss in the second. This might be worse than Idi in the first! For God's sake, Manning overthrows 6'6" Plaxico Burress. How the hell is he going to hit this dwarf?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
parlintm Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 solid pick. gives our offense a whole new dimension. i love it here, especially since we have 56. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gateb Posted April 29, 2006 Author Share Posted April 29, 2006 Please! Will someone just put me out of my misery now! Sinorice Moss in the second. This might be worse than Idi in the first! For God's sake, Manning overthrows 6'6" Plaxico Burress. How the hell is he going to hit this dwarf?? It's going to be for special teams and those quick passes to the outside too. He's going to stretch the field and maybe will have a chip on his shoulder after falling and in the same division as his brother. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
parlintm Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 actually we don't have 56. we traded 56 and one of our 3rds for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gateb Posted April 29, 2006 Author Share Posted April 29, 2006 actually we don't have 56. we traded 56 and one of our 3rds for it. Is it Pittsburgh's? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
parlintm Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 Adds a new dimension to our offense. Stretches it vertically and will be able to give our offense another look. Also great depth for ST. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CharlesShowMeTheWay Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 I can't complain taking him for a 2nd round pick. Nice pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shockjock Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 Which 3rd rounder did we trade to get him? ours or pitt's? either way...good pick here.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
osi724dasack Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 VERY GOOD PICK! But it still doesnt make up for the fact that we wasted a pick in round 1 We could have taken Moss in round 1...and I would have been happier, and we would still have 2 3rd rounders Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Carbo Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 solid pick. gives our offense a whole new dimension. i love it here, especially since we have 56.He had all of 9 TD's in his college career. Nine! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
parlintm Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 He had all of 9 TD's in his college career. Nine! Carbo, 38 seconds ago you were complaing about EA not drafting a vertical receiving threat. Now he has just done that, so please shut the fuck up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
randoff Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 He had all of 9 TD's in his college career. Nine! Hence the reason why he was picked in the 2nd round. Good pick and saves the Org. money...NYG doesn't have to spend 1st pick money on him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Carbo Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 Carbo, 38 seconds ago you were complaing about EA not drafting a vertical receiving threat. Now he has just done that, so please shut the fuck up.Oh, please. In a weak draft for WR's there are half a dozen who are better than "The Gimmick". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeMesiS Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 actually we don't have 56. we traded 56 and one of our 3rds for it. We traded our extra third round pick for someone who going to fall to us regarless? EA is a fucking moron! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njsmalls Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 Oh fuck I'm happy...We still have two FOURTH round picks...Oh La-dee FUCKING-DA I'm soooooooofucking glad! Well I guess EA can't stand having more than six picks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lemmiwinks Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 LOVE IT LOVVVVVE IT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njsmalls Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 LOVE IT LOVVVVVE IT At least we get one good pick in the 2nd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mstrahan22_1/2 Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 i guess i don't see why we didnt just take jackson in the first if we wanted a receiver. he has better size, speed, and better production in college. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plax 4 Prez Posted April 29, 2006 Share Posted April 29, 2006 We traded our extra third round pick for someone who going to fall to us regarless? EA is a fucking moron! I can't believe we could have gotten Chad Jackson or Sanantonio Holmes for our first pick, but instead get another DE that isn't even that good EA what is wrong with you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now