Mr. P Posted May 1, 2009 Share Posted May 1, 2009 according to the roster on giants.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. P Posted May 1, 2009 Author Share Posted May 1, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lughead Posted May 2, 2009 Share Posted May 2, 2009 They spelled Hicks Wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fringe Posted May 2, 2009 Share Posted May 2, 2009 looks like a misspelled knicks jersey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Treehugger Posted May 2, 2009 Share Posted May 2, 2009 They spelled Hicks Wrong. :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigblue25 Posted May 3, 2009 Share Posted May 3, 2009 not sure why he is not #88 its only taking by Matthews and who gives a fuck. #88 looks better then 18 thats a QB's # Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. P Posted May 3, 2009 Author Share Posted May 3, 2009 not sure why he is not #88 its only taking by Matthews and who gives a fuck. #88 looks better then 18 thats a QB's # 12 and 17 are qb numbers too. maybe matthews wasnt willing to give it up and feagles was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clarence the Blue Puppet Posted May 3, 2009 Share Posted May 3, 2009 not sure why he is not #88 its only taking by Matthews and who gives a fuck. #88 looks better then 18 thats a QB's # I agree. I hate seeing receivers taking numbers in the teens. Call me a traditionalist, but I like when receivers where numbers in the 80's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Treehugger Posted May 3, 2009 Share Posted May 3, 2009 I agree. I hate seeing receivers taking numbers in the teens. Call me a traditionalist, but I like when receivers where numbers in the 80's. You need more receiver numbers than QBs though. Calling 1-19 "QB numbers" is just silly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rphguy Posted May 3, 2009 Share Posted May 3, 2009 anybody ever just use the number "0"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now