Go_Eli Posted March 11, 2006 Share Posted March 11, 2006 Wow! Rationale and maturity aren't your strengths, I see. By the way, that website of your's you spam us with in your signature? It sucks. I wasted a minute of my time to visit. It was as dead as your brain. Understanding football and wanting to be educated aren't your strengths either kiddo. I understand it sucks. It does right now. But at least we don't have morons like you, wasting space on a board that hates them. Once again, you want a WR duo that consists of Amani Toomer and Tim Carter? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Carbo Posted March 11, 2006 Share Posted March 11, 2006 . . .Once again, you want a WR duo that consists of Amani Toomer and Tim Carter?I'll take Toomer over Plexiglass any day. As for Carter, he's yet another Giants WR bust who the front office screwed up on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Go_Eli Posted March 11, 2006 Share Posted March 11, 2006 (edited) I'll take Toomer over Plexiglass any day. As for Carter, he's yet another Giants WR bust who the front office screwed up on. Ignore all your personal hatred for Plaxico Burress and think: which WR duo makes the Giants better? (Think before you answer, but I know thinking isn't a strong point for you) Burress and Toomer. or Toomer and Carter Edited March 11, 2006 by Go_Eli Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gateb Posted March 11, 2006 Share Posted March 11, 2006 Again. Another personal attack, but no reply or response to a legitimate post. Burress was not an impact player last year. After week 6 he all but disappeared, and then he became the head case and cancer that we heard he would be. The Giants gambled and lost with that move. Broncos game was pretty good to me. And the Raiders too. Also, when he came on, he drew the double teams more, which may have been the reason Toomer and Shockey both had very good second half of the seasons. Also, I'm not expecting a WR to have stretchable hands, which would have been necessary for SOME and only SOME of Eli's passes, at least that were thrown to him. Second Skins game was a disgrace though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fringe Posted March 11, 2006 Share Posted March 11, 2006 Agreed! the better response would have been "almost?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
njsmalls Posted March 11, 2006 Share Posted March 11, 2006 Any free agent DTs Drew represents that we would be intrested in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plax 4 Prez Posted March 12, 2006 Author Share Posted March 12, 2006 Any free agent DTs Drew represents that we would be intrested in. Money can probably answer that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Nutty Sack Posted March 12, 2006 Share Posted March 12, 2006 Here's the Fab Four's take on Plexy. When he wants to play he's ace's. This usually coincides with passes that he can catch. Unfortunately we do not have a QB that can put the ball in his hands. He needs Phil Simms to come back.l Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gateb Posted March 12, 2006 Share Posted March 12, 2006 Here's the Fab Four's take on Plexy. When he wants to play he's ace's. This usually coincides with passes that he can catch. Unfortunately we do not have a QB that can put the ball in his hands. He needs Phil Simms to come back.l I see strides of improvement. The first part of your statement was infact was correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plax 4 Prez Posted March 12, 2006 Author Share Posted March 12, 2006 Has the deal even been finalized??? I went to giants.com and nfl.com and they say the Giants haven't signed anyone... all I see is Clancy has left Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Floyd The Barber Posted March 13, 2006 Share Posted March 13, 2006 anybody who idolizes this guy is a slimeball... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Nutty Sack Posted March 13, 2006 Share Posted March 13, 2006 EA thought Coughlin could reign in a life long malcontent but failed. Hopefully the lesson has been learned on our interest in Lavar. We'd need a whole section of the bench for sulkers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Floyd The Barber Posted March 13, 2006 Share Posted March 13, 2006 a bench section marked SULKERS/MALCONTENTS , then another section marked PUSSY... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Go_Eli Posted March 13, 2006 Share Posted March 13, 2006 EA thought Coughlin could reign in a life long malcontent but failed. Hopefully the lesson has been learned on our interest in Lavar. We'd need a whole section of the bench for sulkers. I love how the Fab 4 has yet to answer my simple question posted above. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Floyd The Barber Posted March 13, 2006 Share Posted March 13, 2006 I love how the Fab 4 has yet to answer my simple question posted above. that is a dumb question...of course Toomer & Plax. are a better tandem...its just a shame that a part of the tandem beats to his own drum... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Firstnten Posted March 13, 2006 Share Posted March 13, 2006 a bench section marked SULKERS/MALCONTENTS , then another section marked PUSSY... Aren't those the names on your mailbox? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gateb Posted March 14, 2006 Share Posted March 14, 2006 EA thought Coughlin could reign in a life long malcontent but failed. Hopefully the lesson has been learned on our interest in Lavar. We'd need a whole section of the bench for sulkers. Ironic that you are ALWAYS the next post after Floyd isn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now