fringe

you would think. money asked a good question. if not gilbride, who? strangely, it went unanswered.

no drama, just my opinion. go ahead and make fun.

the eagles game i watched was lost by the defense not being able to get off the field on 3rd down.

i don't know what 'not for nothing' means but you are most likely correct. my thing is why does spags get a 'please don't go' for doing the same thing?

to do that, we have to kick past the 30

most organizations would keep these things private. what sense does it make, even if it were true, to publicize this? oh yes, it's so lughead can continue his uninformed vendetta. you showed your true colors by the headline you chose. which has nothing to do with the story. if you keep up with those kind of headlines, i don't think you are moderate enough to be a mod.

I thought it was common knowledge to everyone how delusional the Raider Org is. But if you need a lesson, start here:

The Oakland Raider organization is a center of lies and misinformation. More likely scenario is Gilbride said there was no way he would consider a position with the Raiders. Frankly, Lug I'm surprised you would post such inflammatory crap. Oh, that's right, you hate Gilbride.

Not got- went to a place for a drink and lo and behold, there were naked women there/

Frankly I think it's Boras trying to scare the Dodgies but it's interesting. Put some drama back in left field.

Manny Being A Giant? (01-02) 16:19 PST -- Manny Ramirez to the Giants? It could happen, but nothing appears to be close. The Chronicle has confirmed that the Giants have had conversations with agent Scott Boras regarding the 36-year-old left fielder, but industry sources say a report that the Giants have extended a formal offer to Ramirez for a deal of up to four years was inaccurate. No deal seems imminent between any team and Ramirez, who has 527 career home runs and guided the Dodgers to a National League West title last season after his July-deadline acquisition from the Red Sox. If the Giants seriously engage Ramirez, Boras surely will get the Dodgers involved in trying to re-sign him, and Boras and Dodgers general manager Ned Colletti have not spoken about Ramirez for weeks, save for a recent game of voice-mail tag. As one major-league source familiar with Ramirez's situation said, "This is in the early innings, not the later innings." The Denver Post first reported Thursday that the Giants were "aggressively pursuing" Ramirez. Then, KPIX (Channel 5) reported the Giants had offered Ramirez what looks like a two-year contract with a third-year vesting option and a fourth-year team option. The Giants are not expected to propose a contract that lengthy to Ramirez. However, that they even are discussing a deal with Ramirez speaks to the state of the division in which they play and how tilted the free-agent market is toward buyers.

i did, this morning- see what happened?

i met a stripper in Phoenix (paid for a lap dance and she stayed to chat)- she said she's met Fitzgerald and he had the 'hugest' hands.

Can't win in the playoffs anymore without a running game.

i like the kid- he's a warrior and he's very smart with the football.

i'd say the chances are good- he's not materialistic, you know.

i don't have a god. let me just say that it's easier not to be materialistic when you're making 2 million.

Elway's going to be GM there. That's a losing proposition for any coach. Not that I don't like Elway but nothing could ever be his fault with the endearing mile high fans, yea right.

i don't remember that- i remember belli doing anything he could to be rid of kosar. that and signing andre rison led to his leaving cleveland before the team did. that was pre-genius.

Simms had no takers... He had something brewing with Bellicheck in Cleveland as I recall but it didn't pan out.

won't be an issue- no one likes bellicheck.

Bill Walsh stayed on top by releasing players before they began their downward slide: Joe Montana, Ronnie Lott, Jerry Rice, all finished their careers elsewhere and even had a productive year or 2 where they went. And they still love Walsh.

I know you can't be bothered to read other's posts before you make you're 'i'm the only one conviction'

I'll wait and see who else we get. If we get TJ or equivalent, Toomer would be an ample #3. If we go with a rookie as a # 1, we need a #2 who can stretch the field and shed corners at the line. Toomer has always prospered when there was someone else taking attention away. (Plax or Shockey)

stop spreading false rumors. take that crap to giants.com