fringe

by teams you mean the giants- yea the eagles are our daddy.

Defenses use their energy on stopping Vick. Leave the corners on an island sometimes.

i agree- we need to show a commitment to building back the linebacker position. even if the guy doesn't make an immediate impact, it sets the tone. if you keep on doin what you're doin, you'll keep gettin what you're gettin.

yeah jackson excels at long routes. he's mostly a big play guy. most of the time, the QB doesn't get that kind of protection for him to set up.

i agree as well not every interception was his fault. but not every TD pass is a result of his prowess either. Sometimes he throws a 5 yard screen that turns into a 50 yd TD. Do we analyze those away? When it comes to Eli, it seems an extraordinary effort is put into explaining away his gaffs. All QB's have tips and WR's not running the right routes. In comparison, he threw the most INT's. Live with it. I still love him. And you.

Eli better be picking up the tab on that.

i guess you didn't read my post just decided to give your usual snarky comment. i was breaking down the game-read it again, morphy.

He used to. He also should be in Mets spring training learning how to slide.

this guy looks awesome: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xmh8x4tqOeE

I don't agree with this guy picking apart each interception and saying these weren't Eli's fault. I'm sure there were others that should have been interceptions but weren't. Do we add those back in? And the tips- Eli said himself if he doesn't throw so high, they don't get tipped. I tend to think as BILL PARCELLS says "You are what your record says you are" and total interceptions, in this case 25 means you threw a lot of bad passes. By the title of of this thread the message is we shouldn't criticize Eli because he's the best we've had. We can point out his flaws without condemning him. He had a high risk/high reward, gunslinger type season. I think he'll work to bring down those iINT's next year.

if there was blocking going on at all by the ducks.... seemed like deception was their game plan. btw, i think the groundskeeper had the under. field was in terrible condition.

always cracked me up that mallard went to oregon. yes, mallard was a duck.

yeah mr. air banjo. i think he was on bengals last year.

was that #90? he looked ok. then again no one was blocking him most of the night.

i'd say it's a toss up. shows you how long this has been going on.

Lord knows I try, but I cannot watch College Ball. I really don't know how pro scouts can pick pro players from this game. it has no resemblance to the pros. lamichael james looks good. that's all i can see.

Touching....

Good- that guy deserves a HC job.

lol, not a ringing endorsement, joe! remind me not to have you read my eulogy.

Sounds like everyone is in agreement. Less turnovers, Better LB's, Better Special Teams play.

not sure why you're making a big deal about injuries. it was the healthy defense that failed down the stretch. that, turnovers- by our healthy starters, and special teams.

Ass

Dat not gud

i'll take that action too.

Storm, on 09 January 2011 - 01:15 PM, said: you guys are nuts. Packers by 10. i'll take that bet. best way to make a storm pass.